token.app › Compare › Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.7 Flash is 4.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Gemma 4 31B | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | |
| Input $/1M | $0.200 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $0.400 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.250 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 16K | 66K |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
| GPQA Diamond | 75.8% | 82.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 73.3% | 86.7% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Gemma 4 31B if…
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.250 blended
- Higher GPQA Diamond (82.3% vs 75.8%)
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (86.7% vs 73.3%)
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Gemma 4 31B leads on 0 and Qwen3.7 Flash leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Gemma 4 31B cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.250 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.200 vs $0.030. Output alone: $0.400 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Gemma 4 31B and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Gemma 4 31B: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Gemma 4 31B and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Gemma 4 31B is made by Google. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.