token.app › Compare › GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Gemini 3.7 Flash is 2.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16kGemini 3.7 Flash
ProviderOpenAIGoogle
Input $/1M$3.00$0.750
Output $/1M$4.00$3.75
Blended $/1M$3.25$1.50
Context window16K1.0M
Max output4K66K
ReleasedAug 2023Aug 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $1.50 vs $3.25 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k or Gemini 3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k and Gemini 3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k cheaper than Gemini 3.7 Flash?
Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper: $1.50 versus $3.25 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $3.00 vs $0.750. Output alone: $4.00 vs $3.75.
What context windows do GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k and Gemini 3.7 Flash have?
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k: 16,385 tokens. Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k and Gemini 3.7 Flash?
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k is made by OpenAI. Gemini 3.7 Flash is made by Google.
Related comparisons
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k full details Gemini 3.7 Flash full details GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs Flint (free) GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs Glimpse GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B