token.app › Compare › GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct vs GLM 5.2

GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct vs GLM 5.2

GLM 5.2 is 4.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GLM 5.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
GPT-3.5 Turbo InstructGLM 5.2
ProviderOpenAIZhipu AI
Input $/1M$1.50$0.252
Output $/1M$2.00$0.792
Blended $/1M$1.63$0.387
Context window4K1.0M
Max output4K128K
ReleasedSep 2023Jun 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose GLM 5.2 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.387 vs $1.63 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Jun 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct or GLM 5.2?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct and GLM 5.2, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct cheaper than GLM 5.2?
GLM 5.2 is cheaper: $0.387 versus $1.63 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.50 vs $0.252. Output alone: $2.00 vs $0.792.
What context windows do GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct and GLM 5.2 have?
GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct: 4,095 tokens. GLM 5.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct and GLM 5.2?
GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct is made by OpenAI. GLM 5.2 is made by Zhipu AI.
Related comparisons
GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct full details GLM 5.2 full details GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.2 GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct vs Qwen3.8 Max GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct vs Inkling Small