token.app โ€บ Compare โ€บ GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Mistral Nemo

GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Mistral Nemo

Mistral Nemo leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks. Mistral Nemo is 34ร— cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Mistral Nemo accepts the larger context window (131K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
GPT-3.5 TurboMistral Nemo
ProviderOpenAIMistral AI
Input $/1M$0.500$0.019
Output $/1M$1.50$0.030
Blended $/1M$0.750$0.022
Context window16K131K
Max output4K16K
ReleasedMay 2023Jul 2024
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
GPQA Diamond 27.2% 29.9%
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo ifโ€ฆ
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Mistral Nemo ifโ€ฆ
  • Costs less per token โ€” $0.022 vs $0.750 blended
  • Higher GPQA Diamond (29.9% vs 27.2%)
  • Larger context window (131K)
  • Open weights โ€” self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Jul 2024)
FAQ
Which is better, GPT-3.5 Turbo or Mistral Nemo?
Across the 1 benchmark both models have independently-run scores for, GPT-3.5 Turbo leads on 0 and Mistral Nemo leads on 1. Benchmarks are one input โ€” price and context window are on this page too.
Is GPT-3.5 Turbo cheaper than Mistral Nemo?
Mistral Nemo is cheaper: $0.022 versus $0.750 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.500 vs $0.019. Output alone: $1.50 vs $0.030.
What context windows do GPT-3.5 Turbo and Mistral Nemo have?
GPT-3.5 Turbo: 16,385 tokens. Mistral Nemo: 131,072 tokens.
Who makes GPT-3.5 Turbo and Mistral Nemo?
GPT-3.5 Turbo is made by OpenAI. Mistral Nemo is made by Mistral AI.
Related comparisons