token.app › Compare › GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Qwen3.5-Flash
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Qwen3.5-Flash
Qwen3.5-Flash leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.5-Flash is 6.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.5-Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| GPT-3.5 Turbo | Qwen3.5-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.500 | $0.065 |
| Output $/1M | $1.50 | $0.260 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.750 | $0.114 |
| Context window | 16K | 1M |
| Max output | 4K | 66K |
| Released | May 2023 | Feb 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| GPQA Diamond | 27.2% | 82.3% |
| FrontierMath T1–3 | 0.0% | 18.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 2.2% | 84.4% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.5-Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.114 vs $0.750 blended
- Higher GPQA Diamond (82.3% vs 27.2%)
- Higher FrontierMath T1–3 (18.2% vs 0.0%)
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (84.4% vs 2.2%)
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Feb 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, GPT-3.5 Turbo or Qwen3.5-Flash?
Across the 3 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, GPT-3.5 Turbo leads on 0 and Qwen3.5-Flash leads on 3. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is GPT-3.5 Turbo cheaper than Qwen3.5-Flash?
Qwen3.5-Flash is cheaper: $0.114 versus $0.750 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.500 vs $0.065. Output alone: $1.50 vs $0.260.
What context windows do GPT-3.5 Turbo and Qwen3.5-Flash have?
GPT-3.5 Turbo: 16,385 tokens. Qwen3.5-Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes GPT-3.5 Turbo and Qwen3.5-Flash?
GPT-3.5 Turbo is made by OpenAI. Qwen3.5-Flash is made by Alibaba.