token.app โ€บ Compare โ€บ GPT-4 Turbo vs GLM 5.2

GPT-4 Turbo vs GLM 5.2

GLM 5.2 leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. GLM 5.2 is 39ร— cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GLM 5.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
GPT-4 TurboGLM 5.2
ProviderOpenAIZhipu AI
Input $/1M$10.00$0.252
Output $/1M$30.00$0.792
Blended $/1M$15.00$0.387
Context window128K1.0M
Max output4K128K
ReleasedApr 2024Jun 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
GPQA Diamond 46.6% 91.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 6.7% 86.4%
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose GPT-4 Turbo ifโ€ฆ
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose GLM 5.2 ifโ€ฆ
  • Costs less per token โ€” $0.387 vs $15.00 blended
  • Higher GPQA Diamond (91.9% vs 46.6%)
  • Higher OTIS Mock AIME (86.4% vs 6.7%)
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights โ€” self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Jun 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, GPT-4 Turbo or GLM 5.2?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, GPT-4 Turbo leads on 0 and GLM 5.2 leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input โ€” price and context window are on this page too.
Is GPT-4 Turbo cheaper than GLM 5.2?
GLM 5.2 is cheaper: $0.387 versus $15.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $10.00 vs $0.252. Output alone: $30.00 vs $0.792.
What context windows do GPT-4 Turbo and GLM 5.2 have?
GPT-4 Turbo: 128,000 tokens. GLM 5.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes GPT-4 Turbo and GLM 5.2?
GPT-4 Turbo is made by OpenAI. GLM 5.2 is made by Zhipu AI.
Related comparisons