token.app › Compare › GPT-4 Turbo vs Qwen3.5-Flash
GPT-4 Turbo vs Qwen3.5-Flash
Qwen3.5-Flash leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.5-Flash is 132× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.5-Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| GPT-4 Turbo | Qwen3.5-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $10.00 | $0.065 |
| Output $/1M | $30.00 | $0.260 |
| Blended $/1M | $15.00 | $0.114 |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Max output | 4K | 66K |
| Released | Apr 2024 | Feb 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| GPQA Diamond | 46.6% | 82.3% |
| FrontierMath T1–3 | 0.7% | 18.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 6.7% | 84.4% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose GPT-4 Turbo if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.5-Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.114 vs $15.00 blended
- Higher GPQA Diamond (82.3% vs 46.6%)
- Higher FrontierMath T1–3 (18.2% vs 0.7%)
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (84.4% vs 6.7%)
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Feb 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, GPT-4 Turbo or Qwen3.5-Flash?
Across the 3 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, GPT-4 Turbo leads on 0 and Qwen3.5-Flash leads on 3. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is GPT-4 Turbo cheaper than Qwen3.5-Flash?
Qwen3.5-Flash is cheaper: $0.114 versus $15.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $10.00 vs $0.065. Output alone: $30.00 vs $0.260.
What context windows do GPT-4 Turbo and Qwen3.5-Flash have?
GPT-4 Turbo: 128,000 tokens. Qwen3.5-Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes GPT-4 Turbo and Qwen3.5-Flash?
GPT-4 Turbo is made by OpenAI. Qwen3.5-Flash is made by Alibaba.