token.app › Compare › GPT-4.1 (batch) vs GLM 5.2

GPT-4.1 (batch) vs GLM 5.2

GLM 5.2 is 4.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GLM 5.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
GPT-4.1 (batch)GLM 5.2
ProviderOpenAIZhipu AI
Input $/1M$1.00$0.252
Output $/1M$4.00$0.792
Blended $/1M$1.75$0.387
Context window1.0M1.0M
Max output33K128K
ReleasedApr 2025Jun 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose GPT-4.1 (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose GLM 5.2 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.387 vs $1.75 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Jun 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, GPT-4.1 (batch) or GLM 5.2?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both GPT-4.1 (batch) and GLM 5.2, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is GPT-4.1 (batch) cheaper than GLM 5.2?
GLM 5.2 is cheaper: $0.387 versus $1.75 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.00 vs $0.252. Output alone: $4.00 vs $0.792.
What context windows do GPT-4.1 (batch) and GLM 5.2 have?
GPT-4.1 (batch): 1,047,576 tokens. GLM 5.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes GPT-4.1 (batch) and GLM 5.2?
GPT-4.1 (batch) is made by OpenAI. GLM 5.2 is made by Zhipu AI.
Related comparisons