token.app › Compare › GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash
GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 1.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.050 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $0.200 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.088 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1M |
| Max output | 33K | 66K |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.088 blended
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.088 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.050 vs $0.030. Output alone: $0.200 vs $0.130.
What context windows do GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
GPT-4.1 Nano (batch): 1,047,576 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash?
GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) is made by OpenAI. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons
GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) full details
Qwen3.7 Flash full details
GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)
GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) vs Muse Spark 1.2
GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) vs Qwen3.8 Max
GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest
GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
GPT-4.1 Nano (batch) vs Inkling Small