token.app › Compare › GPT-4.1 Nano vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

GPT-4.1 Nano vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. GPT-4.1 Nano is 17× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
GPT-4.1 NanoGemini 3.6 Flash
ProviderOpenAIGoogle
Input $/1M$0.100$1.50
Output $/1M$0.400$7.50
Blended $/1M$0.175$3.00
Context window1.0M1.0M
Max output33K66K
ReleasedApr 2025Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
GPQA Diamond 48.9% 94.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 28.9% 94.2%
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose GPT-4.1 Nano if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.175 vs $3.00 blended
Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash if…
  • Higher GPQA Diamond (94.1% vs 48.9%)
  • Higher OTIS Mock AIME (94.2% vs 28.9%)
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, GPT-4.1 Nano or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, GPT-4.1 Nano leads on 0 and Gemini 3.6 Flash leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is GPT-4.1 Nano cheaper than Gemini 3.6 Flash?
GPT-4.1 Nano is cheaper: $0.175 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.100 vs $1.50. Output alone: $0.400 vs $7.50.
What context windows do GPT-4.1 Nano and Gemini 3.6 Flash have?
GPT-4.1 Nano: 1,047,576 tokens. Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes GPT-4.1 Nano and Gemini 3.6 Flash?
GPT-4.1 Nano is made by OpenAI. Gemini 3.6 Flash is made by Google.
Related comparisons