token.app › Compare › GPT-4.1 Nano vs Llama 4 Scout
GPT-4.1 Nano vs Llama 4 Scout
GPT-4.1 Nano and Llama 4 Scout split the 2 shared benchmarks evenly. Llama 4 Scout is 1.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Llama 4 Scout accepts the larger context window (1.3M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| GPT-4.1 Nano | Llama 4 Scout | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Input $/1M | $0.100 | $0.100 |
| Output $/1M | $0.400 | $0.300 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.175 | $0.150 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.3M |
| Max output | 33K | 16K |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Apr 2025 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Open weights |
| GPQA Diamond | 48.9% | 51.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 28.9% | 7.8% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose GPT-4.1 Nano if…
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (28.9% vs 7.8%)
- Newer model (released Apr 2025)
Choose Llama 4 Scout if…
- Costs less per token — $0.150 vs $0.175 blended
- Higher GPQA Diamond (51.8% vs 48.9%)
- Larger context window (1.3M)
- Open weights — self-hostable
FAQ
Which is better, GPT-4.1 Nano or Llama 4 Scout?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, GPT-4.1 Nano leads on 1 and Llama 4 Scout leads on 1. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is GPT-4.1 Nano cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper: $0.150 versus $0.175 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.100 vs $0.100. Output alone: $0.400 vs $0.300.
What context windows do GPT-4.1 Nano and Llama 4 Scout have?
GPT-4.1 Nano: 1,047,576 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.
Who makes GPT-4.1 Nano and Llama 4 Scout?
GPT-4.1 Nano is made by OpenAI. Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta.