token.app › Compare › GPT-4o (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash
GPT-4o (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 40× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| GPT-4o (batch) | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $1.25 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $5.00 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $2.19 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Max output | 16K | 66K |
| Released | May 2024 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose GPT-4o (batch) if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $2.19 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, GPT-4o (batch) or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both GPT-4o (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is GPT-4o (batch) cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $2.19 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.25 vs $0.030. Output alone: $5.00 vs $0.130.
What context windows do GPT-4o (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
GPT-4o (batch): 128,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes GPT-4o (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash?
GPT-4o (batch) is made by OpenAI. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.