token.app › Compare › GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs GLM 5.2

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs GLM 5.2

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) is 1.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GLM 5.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GLM 5.2
ProviderOpenAIZhipu AI
Input $/1M$0.150$0.252
Output $/1M$0.600$0.792
Blended $/1M$0.262$0.387
Context window128K1.0M
Max output16K128K
ReleasedJul 2024Jun 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $0.387 blended
Choose GLM 5.2 if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Jun 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or GLM 5.2?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GLM 5.2, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) cheaper than GLM 5.2?
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) is cheaper: $0.262 versus $0.387 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.150 vs $0.252. Output alone: $0.600 vs $0.792.
What context windows do GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GLM 5.2 have?
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18): 128,000 tokens. GLM 5.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GLM 5.2?
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) is made by OpenAI. GLM 5.2 is made by Zhipu AI.
Related comparisons
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) full details GLM 5.2 full details GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs Muse Spark 1.2 GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs Qwen3.8 Max GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs Inkling Small