token.app › Compare › GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is 4.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Qwen3.7 Flash
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba
Input $/1M$0.150$0.030
Output $/1M$0.600$0.130
Blended $/1M$0.262$0.055
Context window128K1M
Max output16K66K
ReleasedJul 2024Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.262 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.262 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.150 vs $0.030. Output alone: $0.600 vs $0.130.
What context windows do GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18): 128,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Qwen3.7 Flash?
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) is made by OpenAI. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons