token.app › Compare › GPT-4o vs Llama 4 Scout
GPT-4o vs Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 Scout leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Llama 4 Scout is 29× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Llama 4 Scout accepts the larger context window (1.3M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| GPT-4o | Llama 4 Scout | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Input $/1M | $2.50 | $0.100 |
| Output $/1M | $10.00 | $0.300 |
| Blended $/1M | $4.38 | $0.150 |
| Context window | 128K | 1.3M |
| Max output | 16K | 16K |
| Released | May 2024 | Apr 2025 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Open weights |
| GPQA Diamond | 47.9% | 51.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 6.3% | 7.8% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose GPT-4o if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Llama 4 Scout if…
- Costs less per token — $0.150 vs $4.38 blended
- Higher GPQA Diamond (51.8% vs 47.9%)
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (7.8% vs 6.3%)
- Larger context window (1.3M)
- Open weights — self-hostable
- Newer model (released Apr 2025)
FAQ
Which is better, GPT-4o or Llama 4 Scout?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, GPT-4o leads on 0 and Llama 4 Scout leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is GPT-4o cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper: $0.150 versus $4.38 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $2.50 vs $0.100. Output alone: $10.00 vs $0.300.
What context windows do GPT-4o and Llama 4 Scout have?
GPT-4o: 128,000 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.
Who makes GPT-4o and Llama 4 Scout?
GPT-4o is made by OpenAI. Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta.