token.app › Compare › GPT-4o vs Qwen3.7 Flash
GPT-4o vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.7 Flash is 80× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| GPT-4o | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $2.50 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $10.00 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $4.38 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Max output | 16K | 66K |
| Released | May 2024 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| GPQA Diamond | 47.9% | 82.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 6.3% | 86.7% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose GPT-4o if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $4.38 blended
- Higher GPQA Diamond (82.3% vs 47.9%)
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (86.7% vs 6.3%)
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, GPT-4o or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, GPT-4o leads on 0 and Qwen3.7 Flash leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is GPT-4o cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $4.38 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $2.50 vs $0.030. Output alone: $10.00 vs $0.130.
What context windows do GPT-4o and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
GPT-4o: 128,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes GPT-4o and Qwen3.7 Flash?
GPT-4o is made by OpenAI. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.