token.app › Compare › GPT-5.2 Pro (batch) vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

GPT-5.2 Pro (batch) vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Gemini 3.7 Flash is 19× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
GPT-5.2 Pro (batch)Gemini 3.7 Flash
ProviderOpenAIGoogle
Input $/1M$10.50$0.750
Output $/1M$84.00$3.75
Blended $/1M$28.88$1.50
Context window400K1.0M
Max output128K66K
ReleasedDec 2025Aug 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose GPT-5.2 Pro (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $1.50 vs $28.88 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, GPT-5.2 Pro (batch) or Gemini 3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both GPT-5.2 Pro (batch) and Gemini 3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is GPT-5.2 Pro (batch) cheaper than Gemini 3.7 Flash?
Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper: $1.50 versus $28.88 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $10.50 vs $0.750. Output alone: $84.00 vs $3.75.
What context windows do GPT-5.2 Pro (batch) and Gemini 3.7 Flash have?
GPT-5.2 Pro (batch): 400,000 tokens. Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes GPT-5.2 Pro (batch) and Gemini 3.7 Flash?
GPT-5.2 Pro (batch) is made by OpenAI. Gemini 3.7 Flash is made by Google.
Related comparisons
GPT-5.2 Pro (batch) full details Gemini 3.7 Flash full details GPT-5.2 Pro (batch) vs Flint (free) GPT-5.2 Pro (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) GPT-5.2 Pro (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 GPT-5.2 Pro (batch) vs Glimpse GPT-5.2 Pro (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) GPT-5.2 Pro (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B