token.app › Compare › GPT-5.4 Image 2 vs GLM 5.2

GPT-5.4 Image 2 vs GLM 5.2

GLM 5.2 is 25× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GLM 5.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
GPT-5.4 Image 2GLM 5.2
ProviderOpenAIZhipu AI
Input $/1M$8.00$0.252
Output $/1M$15.00$0.792
Blended $/1M$9.75$0.387
Context window272K1.0M
Max output128K128K
ReleasedApr 2026Jun 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose GPT-5.4 Image 2 if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose GLM 5.2 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.387 vs $9.75 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Jun 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, GPT-5.4 Image 2 or GLM 5.2?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both GPT-5.4 Image 2 and GLM 5.2, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is GPT-5.4 Image 2 cheaper than GLM 5.2?
GLM 5.2 is cheaper: $0.387 versus $9.75 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $8.00 vs $0.252. Output alone: $15.00 vs $0.792.
What context windows do GPT-5.4 Image 2 and GLM 5.2 have?
GPT-5.4 Image 2: 272,000 tokens. GLM 5.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes GPT-5.4 Image 2 and GLM 5.2?
GPT-5.4 Image 2 is made by OpenAI. GLM 5.2 is made by Zhipu AI.
Related comparisons