token.app › Compare › GPT-5.4 Nano (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

GPT-5.4 Nano (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is 4.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
GPT-5.4 Nano (batch)Qwen3.7 Flash
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba
Input $/1M$0.100$0.030
Output $/1M$0.625$0.130
Blended $/1M$0.231$0.055
Context window400K1M
Max output128K66K
ReleasedMar 2026Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose GPT-5.4 Nano (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.231 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, GPT-5.4 Nano (batch) or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both GPT-5.4 Nano (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is GPT-5.4 Nano (batch) cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.231 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.100 vs $0.030. Output alone: $0.625 vs $0.130.
What context windows do GPT-5.4 Nano (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
GPT-5.4 Nano (batch): 400,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes GPT-5.4 Nano (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash?
GPT-5.4 Nano (batch) is made by OpenAI. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons