token.app › Compare › GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) vs GLM 5.2

GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) vs GLM 5.2

GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) is 1.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) accepts the larger context window (1.1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
GPT-5.6 Luna (batch)GLM 5.2
ProviderOpenAIZhipu AI
Input $/1M$0.100$0.252
Output $/1M$0.600$0.792
Blended $/1M$0.225$0.387
Context window1.1M1.0M
Max output128K128K
ReleasedJul 2026Jun 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.225 vs $0.387 blended
  • Larger context window (1.1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
Choose GLM 5.2 if…
  • Open weights — self-hostable
FAQ
Which is better, GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) or GLM 5.2?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) and GLM 5.2, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) cheaper than GLM 5.2?
GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) is cheaper: $0.225 versus $0.387 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.100 vs $0.252. Output alone: $0.600 vs $0.792.
What context windows do GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) and GLM 5.2 have?
GPT-5.6 Luna (batch): 1,050,000 tokens. GLM 5.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) and GLM 5.2?
GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) is made by OpenAI. GLM 5.2 is made by Zhipu AI.
Related comparisons
GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) full details GLM 5.2 full details GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) vs Muse Spark 1.2 GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) vs Qwen3.8 Max GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) vs Inkling Small