token.app › Compare › GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) vs Claude Sonnet 5

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) vs Claude Sonnet 5

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) is 18× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) accepts the larger context window (1.1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch)Claude Sonnet 5
ProviderOpenAIAnthropic
Input $/1M$0.100$2.00
Output $/1M$0.600$10.00
Blended $/1M$0.225$4.00
Context window1.1M1M
Max output128K128K
ReleasedJul 2026Jun 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.225 vs $4.00 blended
  • Larger context window (1.1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
Choose Claude Sonnet 5 if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
FAQ
Which is better, GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) or Claude Sonnet 5?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) and Claude Sonnet 5, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5?
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) is cheaper: $0.225 versus $4.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.100 vs $2.00. Output alone: $0.600 vs $10.00.
What context windows do GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) and Claude Sonnet 5 have?
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch): 1,050,000 tokens. Claude Sonnet 5: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) and Claude Sonnet 5?
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) is made by OpenAI. Claude Sonnet 5 is made by Anthropic.
Related comparisons
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) full details Claude Sonnet 5 full details GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) vs Muse Spark 1.2 GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) vs Qwen3.8 Max GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) vs Inkling Small