token.app › Compare › GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is 4.1× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) accepts the larger context window (1.1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch)Qwen3.7 Flash
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba
Input $/1M$0.100$0.030
Output $/1M$0.600$0.130
Blended $/1M$0.225$0.055
Context window1.1M1M
Max output128K66K
ReleasedJul 2026Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) if…
  • Larger context window (1.1M)
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.225 blended
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.225 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.100 vs $0.030. Output alone: $0.600 vs $0.130.
What context windows do GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch): 1,050,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash?
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) is made by OpenAI. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons
GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) full details Qwen3.7 Flash full details GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) vs Muse Spark 1.2 GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) vs Qwen3.8 Max GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 GPT-5.6 Luna Pro (batch) vs Inkling Small