token.app › Compare › GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.7 Flash
GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 3.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GPT-6 Luna accepts the larger context window (1.1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| GPT-6 Luna | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.100 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $0.500 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.200 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 1.1M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 66K |
| Released | Sep 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose GPT-6 Luna if…
- Larger context window (1.1M)
- Newer model (released Sep 2026)
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.200 blended
FAQ
Which is better, GPT-6 Luna or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both GPT-6 Luna and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is GPT-6 Luna cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.200 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.100 vs $0.030. Output alone: $0.500 vs $0.130.
What context windows do GPT-6 Luna and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
GPT-6 Luna: 1,050,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes GPT-6 Luna and Qwen3.7 Flash?
GPT-6 Luna is made by OpenAI. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.