token.app › Compare › GPT Audio Mini vs Qwen3.7 Flash

GPT Audio Mini vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is 19× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
GPT Audio MiniQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba
Input $/1M$0.600$0.030
Output $/1M$2.40$0.130
Blended $/1M$1.05$0.055
Context window128K1M
Max output16K66K
ReleasedJan 2026Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose GPT Audio Mini if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $1.05 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, GPT Audio Mini or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both GPT Audio Mini and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is GPT Audio Mini cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $1.05 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.600 vs $0.030. Output alone: $2.40 vs $0.130.
What context windows do GPT Audio Mini and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
GPT Audio Mini: 128,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes GPT Audio Mini and Qwen3.7 Flash?
GPT Audio Mini is made by OpenAI. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons