token.app › Compare › GPT Audio vs Qwen3.7 Flash
GPT Audio vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 80× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| GPT Audio | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $2.50 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $10.00 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $4.38 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Max output | 16K | 66K |
| Released | Jan 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose GPT Audio if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $4.38 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, GPT Audio or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both GPT Audio and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is GPT Audio cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $4.38 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $2.50 vs $0.030. Output alone: $10.00 vs $0.130.
What context windows do GPT Audio and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
GPT Audio: 128,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes GPT Audio and Qwen3.7 Flash?
GPT Audio is made by OpenAI. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.