token.app › Compare › GPT Luna Latest vs Qwen3.7 Flash
GPT Luna Latest vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 3.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GPT Luna Latest accepts the larger context window (1.1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| GPT Luna Latest | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.100 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $0.500 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.200 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 1.1M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 66K |
| Released | Sep 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose GPT Luna Latest if…
- Larger context window (1.1M)
- Newer model (released Sep 2026)
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.200 blended
FAQ
Which is better, GPT Luna Latest or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both GPT Luna Latest and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is GPT Luna Latest cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.200 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.100 vs $0.030. Output alone: $0.500 vs $0.130.
What context windows do GPT Luna Latest and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
GPT Luna Latest: 1,050,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes GPT Luna Latest and Qwen3.7 Flash?
GPT Luna Latest is made by OpenAI. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons