token.app › Compare › gpt-oss-120b (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
gpt-oss-120b (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
gpt-oss-120b (batch) is 4.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| gpt-oss-120b (batch) | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | DeepSeek |
| Input $/1M | $0.030 | $0.150 |
| Output $/1M | $0.136 | $0.600 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.056 | $0.262 |
| Context window | 131K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 118K | 393K |
| Released | Aug 2025 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose gpt-oss-120b (batch) if…
- Costs less per token — $0.056 vs $0.262 blended
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, gpt-oss-120b (batch) or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both gpt-oss-120b (batch) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is gpt-oss-120b (batch) cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
gpt-oss-120b (batch) is cheaper: $0.056 versus $0.262 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.030 vs $0.150. Output alone: $0.136 vs $0.600.
What context windows do gpt-oss-120b (batch) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
gpt-oss-120b (batch): 131,072 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes gpt-oss-120b (batch) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
gpt-oss-120b (batch) is made by OpenAI. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons
gpt-oss-120b (batch) full details
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 full details
gpt-oss-120b (batch) vs Flint (free)
gpt-oss-120b (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free)
gpt-oss-120b (batch) vs Glimpse
gpt-oss-120b (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free)
gpt-oss-120b (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B
gpt-oss-120b (batch) vs Mercury 3