token.app › Compare › gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.7 Flash
gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. gpt-oss-20b is 1.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| gpt-oss-20b | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.018 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $0.090 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.036 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 131K | 1M |
| Max output | 33K | 66K |
| Released | Aug 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
| GPQA Diamond | 60.8% | 82.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 65.3% | 86.7% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose gpt-oss-20b if…
- Costs less per token — $0.036 vs $0.055 blended
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Higher GPQA Diamond (82.3% vs 60.8%)
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (86.7% vs 65.3%)
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, gpt-oss-20b or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, gpt-oss-20b leads on 0 and Qwen3.7 Flash leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is gpt-oss-20b cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
gpt-oss-20b is cheaper: $0.036 versus $0.055 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.018 vs $0.030. Output alone: $0.090 vs $0.130.
What context windows do gpt-oss-20b and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
gpt-oss-20b: 131,072 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes gpt-oss-20b and Qwen3.7 Flash?
gpt-oss-20b is made by OpenAI. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.