token.app › Compare › gpt-oss-safeguard-20b vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

gpt-oss-safeguard-20b vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is 2.0× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
gpt-oss-safeguard-20bDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderOpenAIDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.075$0.150
Output $/1M$0.300$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.131$0.262
Context window131K1.0M
Max output66K393K
ReleasedOct 2025Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose gpt-oss-safeguard-20b if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.131 vs $0.262 blended
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, gpt-oss-safeguard-20b or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both gpt-oss-safeguard-20b and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is gpt-oss-safeguard-20b cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is cheaper: $0.131 versus $0.262 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.075 vs $0.150. Output alone: $0.300 vs $0.600.
What context windows do gpt-oss-safeguard-20b and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
gpt-oss-safeguard-20b: 131,072 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes gpt-oss-safeguard-20b and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is made by OpenAI. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons
gpt-oss-safeguard-20b full details DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 full details gpt-oss-safeguard-20b vs Flint (free) gpt-oss-safeguard-20b vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) gpt-oss-safeguard-20b vs Glimpse gpt-oss-safeguard-20b vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) gpt-oss-safeguard-20b vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B gpt-oss-safeguard-20b vs Mercury 3