token.app › Compare › gpt-oss-safeguard-20b vs Muse Spark 1.2

gpt-oss-safeguard-20b vs Muse Spark 1.2

gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is 15× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Muse Spark 1.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
gpt-oss-safeguard-20bMuse Spark 1.2
ProviderOpenAIMeta
Input $/1M$0.075$1.25
Output $/1M$0.300$4.25
Blended $/1M$0.131$2.00
Context window131K1.0M
Max output66K
ReleasedOct 2025Aug 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose gpt-oss-safeguard-20b if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.131 vs $2.00 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Muse Spark 1.2 if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, gpt-oss-safeguard-20b or Muse Spark 1.2?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both gpt-oss-safeguard-20b and Muse Spark 1.2, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is gpt-oss-safeguard-20b cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2?
gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is cheaper: $0.131 versus $2.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.075 vs $1.25. Output alone: $0.300 vs $4.25.
What context windows do gpt-oss-safeguard-20b and Muse Spark 1.2 have?
gpt-oss-safeguard-20b: 131,072 tokens. Muse Spark 1.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes gpt-oss-safeguard-20b and Muse Spark 1.2?
gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is made by OpenAI. Muse Spark 1.2 is made by Meta.
Related comparisons