token.app › Compare › Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 55× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Grok 4.5 | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $2.00 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $6.00 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $3.00 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 500K | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Released | Jul 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose Grok 4.5 if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $3.00 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Grok 4.5 or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Grok 4.5 and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Grok 4.5 cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $2.00 vs $0.030. Output alone: $6.00 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Grok 4.5 and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Grok 4.5: 500,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Grok 4.5 and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Grok 4.5 is made by xAI. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.