token.app › Compare › Grok 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Grok 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 11× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Grok 4.6DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderSpaceXAIDeepSeek
Input $/1M$2.00$0.150
Output $/1M$6.00$0.600
Blended $/1M$3.00$0.262
Context window500K1.0M
Max output450K393K
ReleasedAug 2026Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Grok 4.6 if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $3.00 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Grok 4.6 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Grok 4.6 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Grok 4.6 cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $2.00 vs $0.150. Output alone: $6.00 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Grok 4.6 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Grok 4.6: 500,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Grok 4.6 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Grok 4.6 is made by SpaceXAI. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons