token.app › Compare › Grok Build 0.1 vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Grok Build 0.1 vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is 23× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Grok Build 0.1Qwen3.7 Flash
ProviderxAIAlibaba
Input $/1M$1.00$0.030
Output $/1M$2.00$0.130
Blended $/1M$1.25$0.055
Context window256K1M
Max output66K
ReleasedMay 2026Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Grok Build 0.1 if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $1.25 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Grok Build 0.1 or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Grok Build 0.1 and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Grok Build 0.1 cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $1.25 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.00 vs $0.030. Output alone: $2.00 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Grok Build 0.1 and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Grok Build 0.1: 256,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Grok Build 0.1 and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Grok Build 0.1 is made by xAI. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons