token.app › Compare › Inkling vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Inkling vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 6.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
InklingDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderThinkingmachinesDeepSeek
Input $/1M$1.00$0.150
Output $/1M$4.05$0.600
Blended $/1M$1.76$0.262
Context window524K1.0M
Max output472K393K
ReleasedJul 2026Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Inkling if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $1.76 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Inkling or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Inkling and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Inkling cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $1.76 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.00 vs $0.150. Output alone: $4.05 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Inkling and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Inkling: 524,288 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Inkling and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Inkling is made by Thinkingmachines. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons