token.app › Compare › Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 19× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Kimi K2.6 | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.580 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $2.44 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $1.04 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 262K | 66K |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Kimi K2.6 if…
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $1.04 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Kimi K2.6 or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Kimi K2.6 and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Kimi K2.6 cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $1.04 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.580 vs $0.030. Output alone: $2.44 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Kimi K2.6 and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Kimi K2.6: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Kimi K2.6 and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Kimi K2.6 is made by Moonshot AI. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.