token.app › Compare › Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) vs Muse Spark 1.2

Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) vs Muse Spark 1.2

Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is free to use, against $2.00 per million tokens. Muse Spark 1.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)Muse Spark 1.2
ProviderInclusionaiMeta
Input $/1MFree$1.25
Output $/1MFree$4.25
Blended $/1MFree$2.00
Context window262K1.0M
Max output33K—
ReleasedAug 2026Aug 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) if…
  • Costs less per token — Free vs $2.00 blended
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
Choose Muse Spark 1.2 if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
FAQ
Which is better, Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) or Muse Spark 1.2?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) and Muse Spark 1.2, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2?
Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is cheaper: Free versus $2.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: Free vs $1.25. Output alone: Free vs $4.25.
What context windows do Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) and Muse Spark 1.2 have?
Ling 3.0 Tiny (free): 262,144 tokens. Muse Spark 1.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) and Muse Spark 1.2?
Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is made by Inclusionai. Muse Spark 1.2 is made by Meta.
Related comparisons
Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) full details Muse Spark 1.2 full details Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) vs Qwen3.8 Max Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) vs Inkling Small Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) vs Qwen3.7 Flash Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) vs Claude Opus 5 (Fast)