token.app › Compare › Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 1.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderMetaDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.400$0.150
Output $/1M$0.400$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.400$0.262
Context window131K1.0M
Max output16K393K
ReleasedJul 2024Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Llama 3.1 70B Instruct if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $0.400 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Llama 3.1 70B Instruct cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $0.400 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.400 vs $0.150. Output alone: $0.400 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct: 131,072 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is made by Meta. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct full details DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 full details Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Flint (free) Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Glimpse Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Mercury 3