token.app › Compare › Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is 2.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Llama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderMetaAlibaba
Input $/1M$0.100$0.030
Output $/1M$0.320$0.130
Blended $/1M$0.155$0.055
Context window131K1M
Max output16K66K
ReleasedDec 2024Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Llama 3.3 70B Instruct if…
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.155 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Llama 3.3 70B Instruct cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.155 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.100 vs $0.030. Output alone: $0.320 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: 131,072 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is made by Meta. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons