token.app › Compare › Llama 4 Maverick vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Llama 4 Maverick vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Llama 4 Maverick is 1.4× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Llama 4 MaverickBeam 1.0 501B A23B
ProviderMetaReflection
Input $/1M$0.188$0.250
Output $/1M$0.652$1.00
Blended $/1M$0.304$0.438
Context window524K1.0M
Max output16K131K
ReleasedApr 2025Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Llama 4 Maverick if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.304 vs $0.438 blended
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Llama 4 Maverick or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Llama 4 Maverick and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Llama 4 Maverick cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper: $0.304 versus $0.438 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.188 vs $0.250. Output alone: $0.652 vs $1.00.
What context windows do Llama 4 Maverick and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
Llama 4 Maverick: 524,288 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Llama 4 Maverick and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Llama 4 Maverick is made by Meta. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.
Related comparisons