token.app › Compare › Llama 4 Scout vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Llama 4 Scout vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Llama 4 Scout is 2.9× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Llama 4 Scout accepts the larger context window (1.3M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Llama 4 Scout | Beam 1.0 501B A23B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Reflection |
| Input $/1M | $0.100 | $0.250 |
| Output $/1M | $0.300 | $1.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.150 | $0.438 |
| Context window | 1.3M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 16K | 131K |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Llama 4 Scout if…
- Costs less per token — $0.150 vs $0.438 blended
- Larger context window (1.3M)
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Llama 4 Scout or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Llama 4 Scout and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Llama 4 Scout cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper: $0.150 versus $0.438 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.100 vs $0.250. Output alone: $0.300 vs $1.00.
What context windows do Llama 4 Scout and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Llama 4 Scout and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.