token.app › Compare › Llama 4 Scout vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)
Llama 4 Scout vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)
Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is free to use, against $0.150 per million tokens. Llama 4 Scout accepts the larger context window (1.3M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Llama 4 Scout | Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Inclusionai |
| Input $/1M | $0.100 | Free |
| Output $/1M | $0.300 | Free |
| Blended $/1M | $0.150 | Free |
| Context window | 1.3M | 262K |
| Max output | 16K | 33K |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Llama 4 Scout if…
- Larger context window (1.3M)
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) if…
- Costs less per token — Free vs $0.150 blended
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Llama 4 Scout or Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Llama 4 Scout and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free), so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Llama 4 Scout cheaper than Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is cheaper: Free versus $0.150 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.100 vs Free. Output alone: $0.300 vs Free.
What context windows do Llama 4 Scout and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) have?
Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens. Ling 3.0 Tiny (free): 262,144 tokens.
Who makes Llama 4 Scout and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta. Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is made by Inclusionai.