token.app › Compare › Llama Guard 4 12B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Llama Guard 4 12B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Llama Guard 4 12B is 1.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Llama Guard 4 12B | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | DeepSeek |
| Input $/1M | $0.180 | $0.150 |
| Output $/1M | $0.180 | $0.600 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.180 | $0.262 |
| Context window | 164K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 16K | 393K |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Llama Guard 4 12B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.180 vs $0.262 blended
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Llama Guard 4 12B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Llama Guard 4 12B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Llama Guard 4 12B cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Llama Guard 4 12B is cheaper: $0.180 versus $0.262 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.180 vs $0.150. Output alone: $0.180 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Llama Guard 4 12B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Llama Guard 4 12B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Llama Guard 4 12B is made by Meta. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons