token.app › Compare › Mercury 3 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Mercury 3 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 3.0× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Mercury 3 | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.100 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $0.350 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.163 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 66K |
| Released | Oct 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose Mercury 3 if…
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.163 blended
FAQ
Which is better, Mercury 3 or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Mercury 3 and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Mercury 3 cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.163 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.100 vs $0.030. Output alone: $0.350 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Mercury 3 and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Mercury 3: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Mercury 3 and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Mercury 3 is made by Inception. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.