token.app › Compare › MiniMax M3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
MiniMax M3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 2.0× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| MiniMax M3 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | DeepSeek |
| Input $/1M | $0.300 | $0.150 |
| Output $/1M | $1.20 | $0.600 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.525 | $0.262 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 512K | 393K |
| Released | May 2026 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose MiniMax M3 if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $0.525 blended
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, MiniMax M3 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both MiniMax M3 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is MiniMax M3 cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $0.525 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.300 vs $0.150. Output alone: $1.20 vs $0.600.
What context windows do MiniMax M3 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
MiniMax M3: 1,048,576 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes MiniMax M3 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
MiniMax M3 is made by MiniMax. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.