token.app › Compare › MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| MiniMax M3.1 Flash | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | DeepSeek |
| Input $/1M | $0.150 | $0.150 |
| Output $/1M | $0.600 | $0.600 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.262 | $0.262 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 524K | 393K |
| Released | Oct 2026 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Open weights |
Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash if…
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Open weights — self-hostable
FAQ
Which is better, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both MiniMax M3.1 Flash and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is MiniMax M3.1 Flash cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
They cost the same on a blended 3:1 basis: $0.262 per million tokens.
What context windows do MiniMax M3.1 Flash and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes MiniMax M3.1 Flash and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash is made by MiniMax. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons