token.app › Compare › Mistral Large 3 2512 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Mistral Large 3 2512 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 2.9× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Mistral Large 3 2512DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderMistral AIDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.500$0.150
Output $/1M$1.50$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.750$0.262
Context window262K1.0M
Max output210K393K
ReleasedDec 2025Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Mistral Large 3 2512 if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $0.750 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Large 3 2512 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Mistral Large 3 2512 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Mistral Large 3 2512 cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $0.750 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.500 vs $0.150. Output alone: $1.50 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Mistral Large 3 2512 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Mistral Large 3 2512: 262,144 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Large 3 2512 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Mistral Large 3 2512 is made by Mistral AI. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons