token.app › Compare › Mistral Large vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Mistral Large vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 11× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Mistral LargeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderMistral AIDeepSeek
Input $/1M$2.00$0.150
Output $/1M$6.00$0.600
Blended $/1M$3.00$0.262
Context window128K1.0M
Max output102K393K
ReleasedFeb 2024Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Mistral Large if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $3.00 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Large or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Mistral Large and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Mistral Large cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $2.00 vs $0.150. Output alone: $6.00 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Mistral Large and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Mistral Large: 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Large and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Mistral Large is made by Mistral AI. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons