token.app › Compare › Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Muse Spark 1.2

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 is 1.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Muse Spark 1.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Mistral Medium 3.5Muse Spark 1.2
ProviderMistral AIMeta
Input $/1M$1.50$1.25
Output $/1M$7.50$4.25
Blended $/1M$3.00$2.00
Context window262K1.0M
Max output——
ReleasedApr 2026Aug 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Muse Spark 1.2 if…
  • Costs less per token — $2.00 vs $3.00 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Muse Spark 1.2?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Mistral Medium 3.5 and Muse Spark 1.2, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Mistral Medium 3.5 cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2?
Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper: $2.00 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.50 vs $1.25. Output alone: $7.50 vs $4.25.
What context windows do Mistral Medium 3.5 and Muse Spark 1.2 have?
Mistral Medium 3.5: 262,144 tokens. Muse Spark 1.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Medium 3.5 and Muse Spark 1.2?
Mistral Medium 3.5 is made by Mistral AI. Muse Spark 1.2 is made by Meta.
Related comparisons
Mistral Medium 3.5 full details Muse Spark 1.2 full details Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max Mistral Medium 3.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Mistral Medium 3.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Inkling Small Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen3.7 Flash