token.app › Compare › Mistral Small 3.1 24B vs Llama 4 Scout

Mistral Small 3.1 24B vs Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Scout leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Llama 4 Scout is 2.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Llama 4 Scout accepts the larger context window (1.3M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Mistral Small 3.1 24BLlama 4 Scout
ProviderMistral AIMeta
Input $/1M$0.351$0.100
Output $/1M$0.555$0.300
Blended $/1M$0.402$0.150
Context window128K1.3M
Max output128K16K
ReleasedMar 2025Apr 2025
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
GPQA Diamond 47.5% 51.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 5.8% 7.8%
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Mistral Small 3.1 24B if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Llama 4 Scout if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.150 vs $0.402 blended
  • Higher GPQA Diamond (51.8% vs 47.5%)
  • Higher OTIS Mock AIME (7.8% vs 5.8%)
  • Larger context window (1.3M)
  • Newer model (released Apr 2025)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Small 3.1 24B or Llama 4 Scout?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Mistral Small 3.1 24B leads on 0 and Llama 4 Scout leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Mistral Small 3.1 24B cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is cheaper: $0.150 versus $0.402 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.351 vs $0.100. Output alone: $0.555 vs $0.300.
What context windows do Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Llama 4 Scout have?
Mistral Small 3.1 24B: 128,000 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Llama 4 Scout?
Mistral Small 3.1 24B is made by Mistral AI. Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta.
Related comparisons