token.app › Compare › Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Mistral Small 3.2 24B is 2.0× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Mistral Small 3.2 24BDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderMistral AIDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.094$0.150
Output $/1M$0.250$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.133$0.262
Context window256K1.0M
Max output16K393K
ReleasedJun 2025Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Mistral Small 3.2 24B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.133 vs $0.262 blended
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Small 3.2 24B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Mistral Small 3.2 24B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Mistral Small 3.2 24B cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Mistral Small 3.2 24B is cheaper: $0.133 versus $0.262 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.094 vs $0.150. Output alone: $0.250 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Mistral Small 3.2 24B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Mistral Small 3.2 24B: 256,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Small 3.2 24B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Mistral Small 3.2 24B is made by Mistral AI. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons
Mistral Small 3.2 24B full details DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 full details Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs Flint (free) Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs Glimpse Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs Mercury 3